Remote scoping
What work is actually required? For electrical, this means translating the panel data and job type into a specific scope of work — what circuits, equipment, and labor are needed. This step is where Treehouse's Edison system operates.
Contractor needs a defined scope of work before pricing. Homeowner needs confidence that the quote they receive is accurate and won't change after a site visit.Hypothesis
This is where Edison operates. The market has very few tools that do this for electrical — Kopperfield is the closest external analogue (unresearched). HVAC has more mature remote scoping tools (Manual J, CoolCalc) that Airship integrates. The absence of an equivalent for electrical is Treehouse's opportunity.Treehouse internal
How competitors approach this
2 companies mapped. Click a company's "View flow" link to see their captured screens.
| Company | What they do | What they automate | Contractor control | FSM relationship | Key strength | Key weakness | Treehouse implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KopperfieldView flow → | Load calculation and electrical design software with permit-ready output. Purpose-built for electrical contractors doing panel upgrades, service changes, and electrification work. Product interior fully unresearched.HypothesisSource | Capture plan includes: load-calculation inputs, existing loads, proposed loads, assumptions, calculation result, code references, errors/warnings. Suggests a structured calculation with automated NEC compliance checking.Hypothesis | Capture plan includes 'editable values' and 'manual override' steps — suggests the contractor can review and modify the automated calculation.Hypothesis | Unresearched. The capture plan ends at permit/document output — unclear whether the scope feeds back into a pricing or proposal tool.Hypothesis | If the load calculation is accurate and the permit-ready output is complete, Kopperfield eliminates a significant amount of manual drafting and code-lookup work.Hypothesis | Business model, pricing, GTM, and FSM integration are all unresearched.Hypothesis | If Kopperfield's calculation is comparable to Edison's and its output is permit-ready, it is a direct competitor for the technical scoping step. The key differentiator to research: does Kopperfield start from a homeowner photo, or does it require a contractor in the field?Hypothesis |
CoolCalcView flow → | HVAC Manual J load calculation tool. The HVAC equivalent of what Edison and Kopperfield do for electrical. Airship integrates Manual J natively for HVAC proposals — this is the tool category Airship relies on.HypothesisSource | Manual J residential load calculation from property inputs.Hypothesis | Unresearched.Hypothesis | Unresearched. Likely standalone with export to proposal tool.Hypothesis | Manual J is the required calculation for HVAC equipment sizing — if CoolCalc is the dominant tool for this, it has a regulatory moat.Hypothesis | HVAC-specific. No electrical equivalent. Not relevant to Treehouse's primary use case.Hypothesis | Manual J for HVAC is the structural analogue for what Edison does for electrical. The HVAC market has standardized on this calculation; the electrical market has not yet standardized on a remote load-calculation tool. That is the window Treehouse is moving into.Hypothesis |
Treehouse read
What Treehouse owns, orchestrates, and defers to the FSM — plus six supporting questions that shape architecture decisions. All entries are hypothesis until validated internally.
The Edison load calculation and scope generation. The NEC/AHJ rules engine. The scope-of-work data model that feeds BOM and pricing.Treehouse internal
The contractor review and sign-off experience. The handoff from scope to BOM generation and pricing.Hypothesis
Job scheduling, technician assignment, on-site work orders. The FSM does not need the detailed scope — it needs the summary and the labor hours.Hypothesis
Edison's NEC compliance engine and local AHJ rule database. The ability to produce a code-compliant, permit-ready scope from panel data and a job type — without a licensed electrician physically assessing the site.Treehouse internal
Property data (square footage, year built, occupancy type). Appliance specification sheets (wattage, amp draw). These are data assets others also have.Hypothesis
The complete scope of work: circuit list, equipment list, labor steps, code references, permit requirements. This is the source of truth for BOM generation, pricing, and permit documentation.Treehouse internal
A reviewable scope of work with the Edison-generated draft highlighted and contractor edits tracked. Code references for any code-required item. A 'scope confidence' indicator.Treehouse internal
NEC load calculation, equipment requirement derivation, code-compliance checking, permit-requirement identification.Treehouse internal
Any scope with physical constraints not determinable from photos. Any local AHJ requirement that Edison's database doesn't have. Any scope with unusual or non-standard configurations.Treehouse internal
Research detail11-field structured template: contractor workflow, information flows, product outputs, FSM read/write
Contractor needs a defined scope of work before pricing. Homeowner needs confidence that the quote they receive is accurate and won't change after a site visit.Hypothesis
Current state: a licensed electrician assesses the site in person, applies NEC code knowledge and local AHJ requirements, and defines the scope from memory and experience. The scope may be written on a notepad or entered into an estimating tool. Remote scoping replaces or supplements the physical assessment.Hypothesis
From photo collection: panel record (main service, breaker inventory, available capacity). From qualification: job type, property address, appliance inventory. From Edison: NEC code rules, local AHJ requirements, load calculation algorithms.Treehouse internal
Edison performs a residential electrical load calculation (NEC Article 220) based on the panel record and appliance inventory. Identifies what upgrades are required (service upgrade, new circuits, panel replacement). Surfaces code-required steps. Produces a draft scope of work.Treehouse internal
Review the Edison-generated scope. Apply local AHJ knowledge that Edison may not have. Confirm or adjust equipment specifications. Identify any physical constraints that weren't visible in photos. Sign off on the scope before it drives pricing.Treehouse internal
Jobs where the physical constraints matter more than the calculated scope — conduit routing, clearance requirements, access constraints. Local AHJ requirements that differ from NEC defaults. Edge cases in the load calculation where assumptions may be wrong.Treehouse internal
A contractor-reviewed scope of work: what circuits are added/modified, what equipment is required, what permits are needed, what the labor steps are. This scope feeds BOM generation and estimation.Treehouse internal
The scope of work may be written back to the FSM job record as notes or as a linked document. The detailed structured scope data lives in Treehouse's project object.Hypothesis
Eliminates the estimation-blocking site visit for jobs where panel data is the primary scoping input. Produces a consistent, code-compliant scope that a less experienced estimator can review rather than generate from scratch.Treehouse internal
Cannot scope jobs with physical constraints that aren't visible in photos. Load calculation accuracy depends on appliance inventory completeness — if the homeowner doesn't know what they're adding, the scope may be wrong. NEC/AHJ variation requires ongoing data maintenance.Hypothesis
This is where Edison operates. The market has very few tools that do this for electrical — Kopperfield is the closest external analogue (unresearched). HVAC has more mature remote scoping tools (Manual J, CoolCalc) that Airship integrates. The absence of an equivalent for electrical is Treehouse's opportunity.Treehouse internal
Open questions
- 01What percentage of electrical jobs scoped by Edison require a subsequent site visit to correct the scope?
- 02How does Edison handle local AHJ requirements that differ from NEC defaults?
- 03What is Kopperfield's load-calculation approach — is it comparable to Edison's?
- 04What job types does Edison handle well versus poorly?
- 05How does the contractor review and sign-off experience work today?
- 06What is the cost of a wrong scope — how often does an Edison-generated scope require revision after a site visit?